【Pokerstars Geld zurück Erfahrungen】North Carolina lawmakers try again to ban college prop bets
House Bill 828 was filed Tuesday (8 April) by Reps. Pricey Harrison, Marcia Morey, Neal Jackson, and Mitchell Setzer. It follows a failed attempt to ban college props last year.
The proposed legislation would mark a significant shift in the regulation of legal sports betting in the state, which launched online betting on 11 March of last year.
Prop bets are wagers placed on specific events within a game that are not directly tied to the final result. These include bets on individual player statistics, such as total points scored or whether a specific player will score during a game.
While prop bets have grown in popularity due to the personalisation and increased engagement they offer, they have also led to unintended consequences. Namely, targeted harassment of college athletes by disgruntled bettors.
North Carolina, in its first year of legal online sports betting, has already seen over $7.2bn in total wagers, including both paid and promotional bets.
Last month, the state set new records for total monthly betting volume and total winnings paid out.
The state government has collected over $135m in taxes from eight licensed operators during that time frame.
Despite the sector’s financial success, some lawmakers are increasingly concerned about the social costs associated with betting, particularly in college athletics.
Stronger support than last session
Rep. Morey brings a unique perspective to the issue as both a former US Olympic swimmer and a former NCAA enforcement official.
Alongside Rep. Harrison, who has historically opposed the expansion of sports gambling, Morey is spearheading efforts to protect student-athletes from the growing incidence of gambling-related abuse.
The proposed ban would apply to both online sportsbooks and any future in-person sports betting venues.
Notably, North Carolina does not currently have brick-and-mortar sportsbooks, but a facility is expected to be developed at the Lenovo Center in Raleigh, which hosts NC State University men’s basketball games.
The bill’s sponsors are not acting in isolation. Nationally, the NCAA is continuing its initiative to eliminate player-specific prop bets on college sports.
This movement gained momentum after growing reports of harassment, particularly during high-profile events like the NCAA basketball tournaments.
During this year’s March Madness, the NCAA aired public service announcements urging bettors and fans to refrain from targeting athletes online.
The campaign emphasised that one in three college athletes report experiencing harassment linked to gambling outcomes.
Former University of North Carolina basketball star Armando Bacot publicly acknowledged receiving hostile social media messages from bettors upset over lost wagers. This type of interaction is not isolated.
More students being targeted over betting losses
According to a study released last year, as reported by the NCAA, 33% of college athletes received abusive messages from individuals with a financial interest in game outcomes.
The study further revealed that 80% of the abuse was directed at athletes participating in March Madness.
Notably, women’s basketball players were targeted at approximately three times the rate of their male counterparts.
NCAA President Charlie Baker has been vocal about the organisation’s stance on the matter.
He has advocated for policy changes across the US to curb prop betting on college players, and has announced that the NCAA is implementing monitoring systems during championship events.
These systems are designed to detect and report serious threats to law enforcement authorities.
As of the start of the 2025 football season, 17 states and the District of Columbia have imposed restrictions on college player prop bets in some form.
In addition to North Carolina, New Jersey has also tried to ban such bets.
The growing patchwork of state-level regulations reflects a broader reckoning in the sports betting industry, balancing the economic benefits of legalised gambling with the need to ensure athlete safety and integrity in collegiate sports.
House Bill 828, if passed, would align North Carolina with the increasing number of states placing limits on prop bets involving amateur athletes.
Related article:
- 6% av ungdomar mellan 16
- Atlantic Lottery CEO Concerned about Illegal Gambling
- MLB Over/Under Best Bet: San Francisco Giants vs. New York Yankees
- Ja Morant Swaps Finger Guns for 'Grenade' in Message to Haters
- Utredning av Spellagen
- Alabama's Gambling Effort Stalls in Senate
- MLB Over/Under Best Bet: Pittsburgh Pirates vs. Cincinnati Reds, April 12
- Alberta Braces for Launch of iGaming Market
- Vann mer än en halv miljon gånger pengarna
- Maryland Charges Against Sweepstakes Casinos
Recommended:
- Zimpler i nytt samarbete med Swish
- Ireland’s New Gambling Regulator is Up and Running
- Sadiq Khan Called Out for Inaction on Betting Ads
- MLB Over/Under Best Bet: Atlanta Braves vs. Tampa Bay Rays, April 13
- Var kan man spela Rapid Fire Jackpots?
- Free Agency Silence Speaks Volumes for These Struggling NFL Teams
- Analysts predict gambling resilience amid Trump tariffs turbulence
- New York Bill to Ban Sweepstakes Casinos Gains Momentum
- Smarrig kontantbonus & free spins
- How to Claim over $2500 in Betting Bonuses for the 2025 NHL Season
- Överföringar blir snabbare och enklare
- Vinn upp till 10 000x i ny Thunderkick slot med äventyrstema
- Will Dogecoin's Price Break $0.185? Here's DOGE's Next Move
- Smarrig kontantbonus & free spins
- BlackRock Bitcoin ETF to Become World's Largest, Predicts Strategy CEO
- En inkörsport till spel om pengar
- Om Infinite Bet Stacker Blackjack
- Innovativ rymdslot med hög träffrekvens
- BlackRock Bitcoin ETF to Become World's Largest, Predicts Strategy CEO
- Årets mest misslyckade spelsläpp